ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "Proof Hypercube 1"

จาก Theory Wiki
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา
 
(Reverted edit of 82.111.20.202, changed back to last version by Parinya)
 
(ไม่แสดง 3 รุ่นระหว่างกลางโดยผู้ใช้ 2 คน)
แถว 1: แถว 1:
 +
== Theorem 1 ==
 
'''Theorem''':  Let <math>v \in \mathbb{S}</math>.  
 
'''Theorem''':  Let <math>v \in \mathbb{S}</math>.  
 
: <math>N(v) \subseteq \mathbb{S} \Rightarrow vol(P_v) = 1/2^n</math>
 
: <math>N(v) \subseteq \mathbb{S} \Rightarrow vol(P_v) = 1/2^n</math>
แถว 12: แถว 13:
 
: <math>x_i - 1/2 = 0</math>  
 
: <math>x_i - 1/2 = 0</math>  
  
So, P_v is defined by the intersection of halfspaces <math>x_i \le 1/2</math> for <math>i= 1, \ldots, n</math>. It is obvious that the volume of this intersection is <math>1/2^n</math> (If you don't believe, you can do Reimann integration of this set).   
+
So, P_v is defined by the intersection of halfspaces <math>x_i \le 1/2</math> for <math>i= 1, \ldots, n</math>. It is obvious that the volume of this intersection is <math>1/2^n</math> (If you don't believe, you can do Reimann integration of this set :P ).   
  
Since the volume can't be any smaller, we conclude that, in this case, <math>Vol(P_v) = 1/2^n</math>
+
Since the volume can't be any smaller, we conclude that, in this case, <math>Vol(P_v) = 1/2^n</math>. A more rigorous proof can also be achieved by considering other halfspaces and argue that it contains at least one of <math>h_i</math>.
 +
 
 +
== Theorem 2 ==

รุ่นแก้ไขปัจจุบันเมื่อ 08:39, 28 ตุลาคม 2550

Theorem 1

Theorem: Let .

Proof: Let where 1 appears at ith position.

There will be some technicalities in the proof. One way to get rid of them is to consider .

Consider a hyperplane halving the middle point between v and The hyperplane is defined by . Working out the calculation,

So, P_v is defined by the intersection of halfspaces for . It is obvious that the volume of this intersection is (If you don't believe, you can do Reimann integration of this set :P ).

Since the volume can't be any smaller, we conclude that, in this case, . A more rigorous proof can also be achieved by considering other halfspaces and argue that it contains at least one of .

Theorem 2