ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "พูดคุย:Proof Hypercube 1"

จาก Theory Wiki
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา
(question...)
 
(Reverted edit of 140.128.20.205, changed back to last version by Jung)
 
(ไม่แสดง 3 รุ่นระหว่างกลางโดยผู้ใช้ 2 คน)
แถว 1: แถว 1:
A more rigorous proof can also be achieved by considering other halfspaces and argue that it contains at least one of <math>h_i</math>.
+
You say:
  
: Is the word '''contain''' ambiguous?? I can see all the points <math>x</math> satisfying <math>x_i < 0.5, \forall i</math> lie below any other halfspace. But I think none of <math>h_i</math> is ''completely'' contained in an other halfspace.
+
A more rigorous proof can also be achieved by considering other halfspaces and argue that it contains at least one of <math>h_i</math>.
 +
 
 +
: Is the word '''contain''' ambiguous?? I can see all the points <math>x</math> satisfying <math>x_i < 0.5, \forall i</math> lie below any other halfspace. But I think none of a hyperplane <math>h_i</math> is ''completely'' contained in an other halfspace.

รุ่นแก้ไขปัจจุบันเมื่อ 08:39, 28 ตุลาคม 2550

You say:

A more rigorous proof can also be achieved by considering other halfspaces and argue that it contains at least one of .
Is the word contain ambiguous?? I can see all the points satisfying lie below any other halfspace. But I think none of a hyperplane is completely contained in an other halfspace.